If by naming something or everything, we are creating division, which is the nature of duality. Then why do enlightened people talk about compassion as being fundamental, even though the nature of attributing meaning to 'something' is divisive?

Tagged:

You’re dealing with conflicting dogmas here. The reality is that Buddhism is not the consistent “philosophical religion” you want it to be. People who are enlightened have ‘merely’ completed a path of mysticism and do not have much more insight than anyone else on things that matter to you. People in